Manifesto
In the kingdom of architecture the shapes reign
supreme. Centuries of the continuous search for a transcendental architecture
serve as evidence that a pure shape is the ultimate aesthetic utopia. Hardcorism
is the theory of architecture as pure geometric shapes. The first endless
architectural manifesto, it announces the advent of an architecture of already
known looks. Hardcorism is form as ideology. Ideology as form.
Architects have been searching for the pure shapes
ever since they started registering icons on a monumental scale. The pure
shapes have become an endless obsession. A Platonic fetish. A recurrent topic. The
pure shapes represent the ultimate aspiration of mankind. A direct connection
to the gods. Form as temple. Religion as geometry.
Hardcorism is pure form unconcealed. It is blunt,
straightforward, explicit, up front. It
presents itself as it is, and represents what it presents. No decoration. No
crime. No ornament. No structure. No distractions. No program. No excuses. No
dialectics. No post-occupancy. No hat-tricks. No diagrams. Archetypes of Jungesque proportions, Hardcorism is pure
imagery embedded in the Collective Unconscious.
Hardcorism is architecture made for photography, for engraving, for model
making. Hardcorism is emphatic; final. Hardcorism is reductionist. It is architecture
as architecture.
Kazimir Malevich was the first Hardcorist artist.
Through his Black Square, Black Circle, and Black Cross (one last ideological
obstacle?) he revealed the ultimate metaphysical paradox: the more abstract the
journey of the artist, the more concrete its depictions, the closer to
Hardcorism. Suprematism was the
consummation of the immaterial as the sublime. The undescribable as graphic
representation. Its forms of action were
the ultimate artistic plateau. Suprematism is Art as Hardcorism.
Theory
Previous failures to understand entire generations
of architectural formalists have impeded the recognition of Hardcorism as a
design theory. A wrongly attached label that reads ‘sporadic coincidences’ have
blurred the omnipresence of an ongoing manifesto. In the place of Hardcorism,
dishonest sociological explanations of colorful diagrams and pseudo scientific
charts distort the silhouettes of timelessness.
Hardcorism is a call for the objectification of the
shapes. It asks for the recognition of the oldest architectural “tradition”. The
vernacular of nowhere. Criticism without critic. Hardcorism represents the most basic
possibility of architectural existence: architecture as form. It defies
utilization and style. It is colorless and egalitarian. It is retrospective,
contemporary and projective. It represents the ultimate architectural
hardliner: form as essence, essence as form.
Hardcorism is the perfect design strategy. It is an
epiphany between initial idea and frictionless achievement. Hardcorism is the Rigor Mortis of conceptual
architecture; stiff, unmovable, rigid, inflexible. It is both pure concept and the abolishment
of concepts. Hardcorism as a concept renders all other concepts obsolete.
The theory of Hardcorism dismantles Koolhaas’ theory
of Bigness. Independently of scale, architecture can always be controlled by a
singular architectural gesture. If Bigness is ultimate architecture, then
Hardcorism is ultimate Bigness. Hardcorism is Bigness on every scale.
Program
Hardcorism is like an architectural black hole: an ever
expanding array of programs that are swallowed by the overall body that
contains them. Tombs, palaces, cenotaphs, ruins, amusement parks, religious
icons, shopping malls, military bases, ecological shelters, political
monuments, communal enterprises, houses, cities; Hardcorism gets automatic
updates from the programs of modernization. In the form of a sphere, a pyramid,
and a cube, Hardcorism is as rigid in its formal appearance as it is flexible
in its use. Hardcorism is Disney meets
Egypt, meets Etienne-Louis Boullée, meets Jean Nouvel, meets George Lucas.
Understanding the theory of Hardcorism requires a
revision of several sacred architectural assumptions, and the incorporation of
a new set of values:
1. Space is irrelevant-
In Hardcorism, architecture is not defined by the space it contains, but by the
envelope of this space. Because the shape of the building is the principal
idea, space becomes residual. The only immutable space in Hardcorism is the one
created between the building and the distance needed for it to be recognized by
the observer.
2. Image is everything-
Because of the importance of its form, Hardcorism is the first voyeuristic
architecture. In Hardcorism the overall
image of the building determines its existence.
3. Form is absolute- Since
all that matters under the reign of Hardcorism is the shape of the building, architecture
becomes indifferent to issues like program, scale, typology, and site. Without
absolute form there is no Hardcorism.
4. Architecture is immaterial-
When architecture reaches its Hardcorist state, its existence transcends
materiality. Hardcorism is architecture as Styrofoam, plastic, resin, stone,
concrete, wood, steel, glass, cardboard, paper, charcoal, clay.
Political
Because of its indifference to any kind of ideology,
Hardcorism is the perfect bait for political iconography. Its honesty of form
is the ultimate chameleonic property: because it can’t be anything else, it’s
always said to be something else. Hardcorism
has been fascist and democratic, tyrannical and populist, capitalist and
communist, commercial and spiritual, ecological and destructive. It has been
protagonist in history books and antagonist in science fiction films. It has
represented all the good mankind has to offer and all the atrocities of man.
Hardcorism is a form of endless modernity. A timeless classic. An ongoing
tragedy. Hardcorism is where the novel of architecture reached its climax and has
hung in suspense ever since.
Invulnerable to social, political, and economic influences,
Hardcorism represents architecture as pure autonomy. The presence of Hardcorism
obliterates the need of authorship. Hardcorism sequesters architecture from the
architect. It announces the removal of the author. The disappearance of the visionary.
It is architecture post-architect. Hardcorism is the immaculate conception of architecture.
Creation without inspiration. Architecture as artifice. Hardcorism requires the
rewriting of the sacred books. On the seventh day, Hardcorism was created.
Doxa
Because it reduces architecture to its smallest possible
form of being, Hardcorism represents the atomization of architecture. Its
blatant existence paints the most sacred dogmas obsolete. Hardcorism is both
the abolition of ‘isms’ and the ultimate ‘ism’. It strips architecture naked.
It represents the purging of styles, the end of detail. Hardcorism is
architecture post-Mies. God is in the
shapes.
A cross section through the history of architecture
would reveal that Hardcorism is like a train in a looping railway: it does not
matter how much the surrounding landscape changes, in the end it has inevitably
to return where it started. Hardcorism
is what architecture has been always looking for. It represents both the birth of and the death
of architectural history. An epistemological aftermath, the theory of
Hardcorism implies architecture as perpetual reincarnation in a body that looks
the same.
Hardcorism is architecture’s ultimate orthodoxy. Hardcorism means not needing
to think. Hardcorism is architectural unconsciousness.[2] Hardcorism is a post-human enterprise. No
genius-loci. No phenomenology. Hardcorism is everywhere and nowhere at the same
time. It is the zeitgeist of forever. Hardcorism is architecture in its
motionless state. It is an icon in the city, in the dessert, in the sea, in the
sky. Like in a Suprematist painting, Hardcorism is all that remains after the
world has been scrapped out of excess. Hardcorism is the slogan of the
powerful, and the ethos of the subversive:
“Under the pavement, the shapes”.
The Manifesto of Hardcorism.
I'm laptop shopping, and i hear macs are really fast and are good for intense programs like photoshop or illistrator, and i was just wondering if macs have an advantage over pc in CAD programs such as autodesk inventor or Solidworks? Which would be better?.
ReplyDelete